Sri Lanka – Latest IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 – December 2024 (Academic)

WRITING TASK 1

The maps below show the changes that have taken place at an Australian Zoo between 1960 and now.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Write at least 150 words (You should spend 20 minutes on this task).

Sample Answer

The image depicts the evolution of a zoo’s layout between 1960 and the present. In the 1960s, the zoo featured distinct enclosures for African animals, Australian animals, birds, and chimpanzees. The entrance was located near the gift shop, and the picnic area was situated further away. Today, the zoo has undergone significant changes. The enclosures for African and Australian animals have been combined, and there are no dedicated areas for birds or chimpanzees.

The entrance has been relocated closer to the ferry, and the picnic area has been moved closer to the entrance for greater convenience. A notable addition is the cable car, providing a fun and efficient way for visitors to navigate the zoo. These changes likely reflect a shift towards more naturalistic animal enclosures, improved visitor experience, and a focus on conservation and education, which are hallmarks of modern zoos.

WRITING TASK 2

Many people believe that reducing the income gap between the rich and the poor can lead to a happier society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.

Sample Answer

I strongly agree that reducing the income gap between the rich and the poor can lead to a happier society. A more equitable distribution of wealth promotes social stability, reduces poverty, and fosters a sense of community, which can significantly enhance overall well-being.

Firstly, when income inequality is reduced, individuals from lower-income groups have better access to education, healthcare, and opportunities, which improves their quality of life. This can lead to a more prosperous society as a whole, where fewer people are struggling with poverty and its associated challenges. For example, in countries like Sweden and Norway, where wealth distribution is more equal, there is a higher standard of living, and people report greater happiness and life satisfaction. These nations prioritize social safety nets, such as universal healthcare and education, which contribute to a healthier, more content population.

Additionally, reducing the income gap can promote social harmony and reduce feelings of resentment. In societies with large income disparities, there is often a sense of division between the rich and the poor, leading to social unrest. When wealth is more evenly distributed, there is less of a “us vs. them” mentality, fostering greater social cohesion. Research has shown that countries with lower income inequality, like Japan and Finland, tend to experience less crime, better mental health, and stronger community bonds.

Moreover, reducing the income gap can encourage a culture of mutual support and cooperation, rather than competition and individualism. In societies with extreme wealth disparities, there is often an emphasis on material success, which can lead to stress, anxiety, and a sense of inadequacy, particularly among those in lower income brackets. By promoting greater equality, society can shift its focus to values such as well-being, collaboration, and shared prosperity.

However, it is important to note that reducing income inequality alone is not a magic solution to societal happiness. It must be accompanied by other measures, such as improving mental health services, fostering work-life balance, and addressing social and environmental challenges. Income redistribution must be implemented carefully to avoid disincentivizing hard work and innovation, which can ultimately harm economic growth.

In conclusion, reducing the income gap between the rich and the poor can contribute significantly to a happier society. It leads to better opportunities, social harmony, and improved well-being for all. While it is not the only factor that determines happiness, making efforts to reduce income inequality can create a more balanced and content society.